Pasadena chefs from around the world share their favorite festive recipes and traditions.

If you’re wondering what to whip up for your holiday get-together — and whether to cook from scratch or bring in precooked food — think about this: Some of the world’s great chefs, writers, philosophers and gourmets have weighed in over the years on the subject of home cooking. All seem to agree that the home-cooked offering has spirit and soul, an undefinable and mysterious essence that somehow transmits satisfaction to those who gather to eat it. And the very act of cooking is an act of giving, they say. Around the globe, in every culture and corner of the world, cooking is the ritual that causes people to gather, bond and enjoy. It doesn’t really matter whether the food is plain or fancy.

“The best meals occur in a context that frequently has very little to do with the food itself,” said the late celebrity chef and TV personality Anthony Bourdain, who also said that “food may not be the answer to world peace, but it’s a start.”

So stop pondering and start planning something that will be very simple to prepare but delivers to guests a heartwarming, tasty gift from you — the preparer. Here in Arroyoland we have extraordinary access to foods from around the globe — from the profusion of small ethnic shops selling exotic spices and herbs to huge emporiums that offer gourmet delicacies. And we have an equally diverse and expandng array of dining spots headed by renowned chefs. We spoke to three who hail from different parts of the world to get their take on what holiday entertaining means in their culture, and what they like to serve. Surprisingly, many of them mentioned fish.

MARK PEEL

Prawn Coastal

Renowned American chef Mark Peel is a Pasadena native who has cooked for the one-percenters for much of his life. Starting with Wolfgang Puck’s Spago, he went on to Chez Panisse in Berkeley, then Tour d’Argent and Le Moulin de Mougins in France. Then he cofounded Los Angeles’ La Brea Bakery and the world-class, award-winning restaurant Campanile, where for about 25 years he helped redefine fine dining with an emphasis on farm-to-table fresh food.

Peel opened the seafood-centric Prawn Coastal in Pasadena about a year ago. It’s his concept of fine dining with a casual twist and approachable prices, and everything’s available for takeout. “It’s the biggest part of our business,” he says.

We caught up with Peel by phone while he was collecting his 9-year-old son from gymnastics class, and he was philosophical about holiday entertaining: “In a funny way, I think holiday parties or party eating is often not so much about food as it is about the company. With great people you could be eating cotton candy and tofu and it doesn’t really matter. In fact, it’s great to serve something very easy to prepare, so the host doesn’t have to spend much time and effort doing it.

“One of my favorite things is to get a whole filet of salmon, take the skin off and the pin bones out, and sear it. Then gently braise it in a little bit of vegetable broth. The fish will give the broth its own flavor. This doesn’t take long to do, it really doesn’t take much effort, and it’s a beautiful presentation.”

“What’s also really good is doing something like little soft tacos. Some pulled pork with assorted accompaniments like pickled onions, pickled cabbage and salsa. And some grated cheese, like a really good fontina. And diced tomatoes. One small benefit of global warming is that we get really good tomatoes right up to the end of the year. With something like tacos, the host doesn’t have to continually be cooking. You have the hot pulled pork, the warm steamed tortillas and maybe you butter them a bit, with a little bit of garlic. Just lay it all out and let the guests build their own. They can stand and hold the tacos while they converse.”

Peel says he remembers doing a birthday party years ago for the popular food critic and author Ruth Reichl. “There were all those famous folks and foodies, and I made just these little soft tacos with all the fixings and they were a very big success,” he recalls. “If you take something really simple and do it really, really well, you can’t beat it.”

STURGEON OR SALMON IN A RED WINE SAUCE

This is based on a classic French matelote, a fish stew made with river fish (often eel) and red wine. We’ve done it at the restaurant with sturgeon, salmon and trout. Monkfish also works well. I think of the dish as a winter fish stew, with rich, complex flavors. It’s a convenient dish for entertaining because you can have everything prepared ahead of time, then cook the fish in the red wine sauce at the last moment. Instead of the fish stock, you can use half chicken broth and half water. Fish stock is preferable, but you can buy chicken broth at the store.

Ingredients

¼ pound bacon (about 4 strips), cut crosswise in ¼-inch strips

2 tablespoons water

1 tablespoon all-purpose flour

½ medium onion, sliced crosswise against the grain

Kosher salt

A bouquet garni made with a few sprigs each parsley and thyme, a bay leaf, 2 garlic cloves, (halved and green shoots removed) and 1½ teaspoons peppercorns

2 cups red wine, such as pinot noir

2 cups chicken stock or 1 cup canned
         broth and 1 cup water

8 pearl onions, blanched and peeled, or small spring onions (bulbs only)

1 tablespoon unsalted butter

3 ounces wild mushrooms, cut in ½-inch-thick slices or separated into small clumps (depending on the type of mushroom)

Freshly ground black pepper

2 pounds sturgeon, monkfish, salmon or trout fillets

Minced fresh flat-leaf parsley, for garnish

Method

1. Combine the bacon with the water in a large saucepan over medium heat and cook, stirring from time to time, until the bacon is lightly browned, 5 to 8 minutes. Add the flour and cook, stirring, for a minute, then add the onion and ½ teaspoon salt. Cook, stirring often, until tender, about 5 to 8 minutes. Add the bouquet garni and the wine and bring to a boil, stirring the bottom of the pan with a wooden spoon to deglaze. Add the stock (or broth and water), bring to a simmer, cover, reduce the heat, and simmer 30 minutes, stirring often. Strain through a medium strainer and set aside

2. Meanwhile, make a small slit with a paring knife in the ends of the pearl or spring onions. Heat the butter in a wide, lidded skillet over medium heat and add the onions and ½ teaspoon salt. Cook, stirring often, until beginning to color, 3 to 4 minutes, then add the mushrooms. Cover and cook over medium-low heat until tender, about 5 minutes. Stir from time to time and add 1 tablespoon of water if the pan dries out and the vegetables begin to stick. Taste and adjust the salt. When tender, add the strained red wine sauce and simmer 5 minutes.

3. Taste the wine sauce and add salt and pepper as needed. Remove from the heat if not serving right away. Shortly before serving, bring the sauce to a simmer. Season the fish fillets with salt and pepper and add to the sauce. They should be barely covered with the sauce. Cover and cook gently, being careful not to allow the sauce to boil, until cooked through but not falling apart, about 8 to 10 minutes for sturgeon or monkfish, 5 minutes for salmon, 3 minutes for trout fillets. Taste the sauce again and adjust the seasonings.

4. Remove the fish to a warm platter and spoon on some of the sauce with the onions and mushrooms over and around the fish. Sprinkle with parsley, and serve with boiled potatoes or fresh noodles.

Note: If serving with noodles (I recommend pappardelle or wide egg noodles), mound the cooked noodles on a large platter. Arrange the fish fillets on top of the noodles and spoon on a generous amount of sauce. Sprinkle with parsley and serve.

Reprinted with permission from New Classic Family Dinners by Mark Peel (Wiley; 2009).

MATHIAS WAKRAT AND JEAN-CHRISTOPHE FEBBRARI

Entre Nous

New on Pasadena’s culinary landscape is Entre Nous, which opened in October. It’s owned by chefs Mathias Wakrat and Jean-Christophe Febbrari. Both were born in small French Riviera towns not far from each other, but they didn’t meet until they came to Eagle Rock, where both worked in the kitchen of Cafe Beaujolais. They became best friends, eventually taking the Beaujolais over as owners, and for 20 years their successful French cafe served up what Gayot.com called “more genuine bistro charm than most of their better known Westside counterparts,” with the kind of “simple, unpretentious fare you’d find at a family-run bistro in Paris.”

We asked Mathias why they decided to open in Pasadena. “My partner, Jean-Christophe, has lived in Pasadena for 20 years with his wife and kids. So our families spent a lot of time there together. We never wanted a second restaurant location, but we always used to look at that particular spot on Green Street, where there was already a restaurant [Ración], and we used to say it would be a perfect place for a bistro like ours. Then it became available and we couldn’t resist. So we sold our shares in Beaujolais and made the move.”

Asked about his holiday food memories growing up in France and his thoughts on holiday cooking, he said, “Where we’re from, on the Riviera, is different from big cities like Paris or L.A. We come from small coastal villages, so everything has to have fish. There was no special holiday dish I remember growing up. We always ate bouillabaisse, even at the holidays. We grew up with that, we love it and we serve it as much as we can at Entre Nous. Of course it’s not exactly the same as in France because we don’t have the rockfish here that we have there. The fish we serve here depends on the daily catch. Whatever is the most fresh and highest quality at the market that day is what we put in our fish stew. We also had sea bass in France growing up. We serve that over lentils at Entre Nous, along with mussels and all sorts of other great regional dishes that are like those where we’re from. We have amazing escargots on the menu that we import directly from the Burgundy region.” Most popular so far in the restaurant’s short tenure, he says, is ribeye steak with peppercorn sauce and fries.

Is there something special he’d recommend for a small casual holiday dinner party? “Anything French,” he says with a chuckle. “You might try serving mussels and homemade French fries with a green salad afterward, which is when the French serve their salads. And perhaps a crème brûlée for dessert.”

Moules Provençales (Mussels)

Proportions are for one order

Ingredients

3 tablespoons butter

1 tablespoon minced shallots

2 ounces white wine

1 pound mussels

2 ounces heavy cream

1 tablespoon chopped parsley

Freshly ground pepper

Sea salt

Method

Melt 1 tablespoon butter in a large sauté pan on high heat, then add shallots, white wine and mussels. Cover, and when the mussels start opening, add heavy cream, 2 tablespoons butter, parsley, pepper and a small pinch of sea salt. Cover again. When mussels are all open, remove them to a bowl with a slotted spoon. Reduce the liquid in the pan by one-third, taste for seasoning, pour liquid over mussels and sprinkle generously with more freshly chopped parsley. Enjoy with homemade French fries.

ERWIN TJAHYADI

Bone Kettle

Chef Erwin Tjahyadi of Pasadena’s Bone Kettle restaurant was born in Indonesia and made his mark as a chef here by keeping Asian culinary traditions alive. “Being Asian, you’re always interested in assimilating both cultures, and the holidays are a time when it’s fun to do that,” he says. “In America, the traditional holiday dinner might be turkey or a great ham. To add an Asian touch, it’s all about incorporating spices and herbs that are indigenous to Southeast Asian cooking, although you’re using them on food that is not necessarily available in Southeast Asia. We actually don’t have much ham in Indonesia, for example. It’s a luxury item. But if you add sambal, which is Indonesian chili sauce, to turkey or ham, it’s a great way to introduce Southeast Asian flavor and also put a little heat into your dishes. You can also add sambal to batter or curry or sauces and use it with any meal as a condiment. It’s very versatile.

“At holiday season we love using yellow turmeric rice as a staple with all our savory meat dishes. It’s bright yellow, has a beautiful aroma and is distinctive in taste. And it’s easy to make at home. You can shape it into a beautiful cone, something like a Christmas tree.

“We also love to infuse pandan essence into our desserts and baked goods. Pandan is a leaf that grows in Southeast Asia. It adds a beautiful green flavor that’s unique, naturally sweet, fragrant and delicious — just right for baking at the holidays. For dessert, maybe a jackfruit eggroll served with banana pudding for dipping.”

We’re lucky there are so many Asian groceries nearby where all these things are available, Tjahyadi notes, making it easy for anyone who loves Asian flavors to try adding them to holiday dishes.

TURON (Fried banana rolls)

Ingredients

12 bananas, sliced

2 ripe jackfruit

1½ cups brown sugar

12 pieces spring roll wrapper

2 cups cooking oil

Powdered sugar

Method

1. Pour the brown sugar onto a plate, and roll each banana slice in it, ensuring that it is coated with enough sugar. Place the coated banana in a spring roll wrapper and add about 6 ounces of jackfruit. Fold and lock the spring roll wrapper, using water to seal the edge.

2. In a pan, heat the oil and add leftover brown sugar. When the brown sugar floats, add wrapped banana and fry until the wrapper turns golden brown and the extra sugar sticks to the wrapper. Dust powdered sugar on the banana and serve with banana pudding (see below) for dipping.

BANANA PUDDING

Ingredients

8-ounce package of cream cheese

14-ounce can of condensed milk

1 packet of vanilla pudding mix

1½ cups milk

1½ cups heavy cream

1 teaspoon vanilla extract

4 ounces of whipped cream

2 to 3 bananas, sliced

Method

Place all ingredients in a bowl, mix together and serve cold in individual bowls.

Can giving bring you better health, more joy and a longer life? Pasadena psychologist Annette Ermshar says yes, it can.

We all know two kinds of people: those who give and those who don’t. People we’d turn to in times of emotional or financial crisis, and those we’d avoid because they always seem too focused on themselves. Of course, we’d probably never think to categorize our friends and family that way, but mental health professionals have found such classifications to be a rewarding subject of study. Pasadena resident Annette Ermshar is one of those pros. A clinical psychologist with a private practice in San Marino, Ermshar has a Ph.D. in clinical and neuropsychology and a post-doctoral master’s degree in clinical psychopharmacology; she’s also a board-certified diplomate in forensic psychology, which is the intersection of law and mental health.
At 45, Ermshar has already seen the best and the worst sides of human nature. She now spends most of her time in private practice with “regular” clients who seek help and healing for challenges that affect their work and personal lives, but she also spent 16 years on staff at San Bernadino’s maximum-security Patton State Hospital, which treats mentally disordered, violent and insane individuals who’ve been remanded there by the courts. She is a mental health assessment expert for both state and federal courts and is on staff at Las Encinas mental health hospital in Pasadena.
We talked with Ermshar for this philanthropy issue because she’s also an expert on the subject of giving and its effects on mental and physical health. She has written and delivered talks on the subject, and is quite a giver herself. She says she has volunteered “countless hours” of her time for various nonprofits (the list is too long to print here) and she and her husband of nine years, Dan Monahan, have given financial support to organizations that promote the arts as well as the welfare of adults and children in need. Ermshar is chairman of the board of directors for Adventist Health Glendale Foundation, board vice president for the Pasadena Symphony and Pops, board vice-chair of the Los Angeles Master Chorale and a board member of The Music Center’s Blue Ribbon. She was formerly on the Seaver Board of Visitors of Pepperdine University (where she received her B.A. in 2000) for over a decade.
Ermshar grew up in La Caňada Flintridge and earned her Ph.D. from Loma Linda University (which is both of her parents’ alma mater) and her postdoctoral master’s degree in clinical psychopharmacology from Alliant International University. We asked her to talk about what givers get from giving.

Many associate the word “philanthropy” with rich people who donate large sums of money, but the word actually comes from the ancient Greek and simply means kindliness, benevolence and a love of humanity. I notice you don’t much use the word philanthropy in your talks but seem to prefer the word generosity, and you always link it to the benefits that accrue to those who give rather than to those who receive.
Yes, in my talks, I describe the physical and mental health benefits of generosity. If you look at the subject of giving as a whole, when we give of ourselves — whether it’s our time, our energy or our money — we are certainly benefitting others but we are also receiving a significant benefit to ourselves. There’s a wealth of research that shows that altruism and generosity have immense benefits to the giver. In general, the act of giving promotes mental and physical health, promotes positive brain changes that are associated with happiness, reduces our stress levels and even helps us live longer. There are scientific studies showing all of those things.

So generosity and altruism can mean any kind of giving, whether it’s emotional or financial support, or time donated volunteering — anything that is of benefit to others rather than to oneself?
Yes.

You’ve said that spending money on others actually produces a greater level of happiness than spending it on yourself. That’s surprising.
Yes, there’s some really great science on that. Let me give you just one example: Researchers reviewed fMRIs [functional magnetic resonance images, which measure and map brain activity] and they found that the same reward system activated in the brain with someone who received money is also activated in the brain of those who give money to others. That means the brain and the body experience positive benefits from choosing altruism over personal or selfish interests. Ultimately the giver experiences greater happiness by giving to others rather than by giving to themselves.

You say that giving benefits physical health and reduces stress. Can you explain a bit more?
That’s right. Emotions related to altruism help to stabilize the immune system and help to fight against the immune-suppressing effects of stress. On the contrary, shame and selfishness are linked to higher levels of the hormone cortisol, which is the body’s main stress hormone. Acts of altruism also reduce pain by stimulating the brain to release “the happy hormones,” or endorphins, which are natural painkillers.

You’ve referred to studies that suggest those who give or volunteer can experience what’s called a “helper’s high” along with other significant benefits. Can you elaborate?
Yes, so among retirees, for example, researchers found that those who volunteer score significantly higher in life satisfaction and the will to live, compared to those that did not volunteer. Likewise, researchers reported fewer symptoms of depression, anxiety and somatization [medical symptoms with no discernable cause] among individuals who volunteered. Altruism is often linked to deeper and more positive social integration, distraction from personal problems and distraction from anxiety. Giving has been shown to lend enhanced meaning and purpose in life and a sense of well-being.

Do the same health and happiness benefits accrue to those who support only close family members and close friends as opposed to those who support strangers and causes unrelated to them?
I think research would show that any time one is giving support to others, benefits accrue to the giver. Research shows that those who give social support to others have greater life expectancy and those others can be family or anyone else. I’ve seen research with the elderly who were taking over the role of parenting because their adult child either worked or had some kind of illness or addiction. This kind of parenting or grandparenting among the elderly resulted in very positive physical and mental health benefits to them. And as far as volunteering outside the family, a UC Berkeley study found that elderly people who volunteer for two or more organizations are 44 percent more likely to live longer than others who do not. So volunteering among the elderly is associated with lower risk of mortality, for sure. There’s also a great Duke University study of individuals with post-coronary artery disease. Those individuals who volunteered after their heart attacks reported reductions in despair and depression, which are two factors linked to increased mortality in this type of patient.

Do altruism and generosity depend on empathy?
I think they all go hand in hand: Altruism, empathy, generosity, compassion, those all work in harmony, they’re all sort of a similar construct. But you could have empathy and compassion, and that doesn’t necessarily mean you are giving. To be giving requires a step beyond all those traits, where you are actually taking action.

But in order to want to give, doesn’t one need to experience empathy and compassion?
Yes, that’s true.

A university study done recently found that three out of four students showed 50 percent less empathy than 30 years ago, and that the emergence of social media in the early 2000s helped to greatly accelerate that trend. Researchers said that texting instead of talking one-on-one eliminates the emotional connection, and that leads to lack of empathy. I’m wondering if you’ve noticed a drop in volunteerism among younger adults.
I’m not sure about the data you’re referring to because what’s very interesting to me is that there are a lot of millennials very interested in larger social causes and social justice, and I think that is a form of giving to others. Maybe not on an individual scale, but on a larger scale. And there’s a new trend of the millennial generation joining boards, with major corporations including 20somethings on their boards of directors. Heretofore this never really existed. For example, the hospital where I’m chairman of the board — we have someone on the board of directors who is in her 20s. This is just so wonderful because she has a great perspective and energy and has a donor demographic that is really important to include for any organization.

How did you get so involved with philanthropy and its effects on givers? You seem to have turned it into a kind of second vocation.
There are a few reasons. First, I was raised in a family that was very philanthropic and generous with their time and money, so it was a value I received from my parents. Second, because I do a lot of philanthropy, I wanted to better appreciate the effects it has on me. Third, I’m in the business of treating individuals for their mental health, inspiring in them hope and healing. It is really clear to me that generosity and giving is very beneficial to one’s mental health, which is what I’m in the business of doing. I’m constantly encouraging my clients to volunteer and engage in various forms of generosity.
When there’s a demonstrable reduction in despair and depression and a greater sense of purpose in life, you know, that’s music to my ears because that’s the whole dedication of my career.

Can astronomers help save our planet? Pasadena’s Marja Seidel travels to Earth’s most remote spots, explaining our unique place in the universe to underserved children

“Right now, we are spinning at around 800,000 kilometers per hour around the center of our galaxy, and at around 100,000 kilometers per hour around the sun. And every day we follow our routines and forget how lucky we really are to be living on this unique planet.” That’s astronomer Marja Seidel introducing a short film about one of her recent expeditions to very remote areas of the globe, helping others to understand the uniqueness of our planet, its place in the universe and the need to preserve it.
Seidel, 29, has reached thousands of people on five continents with her unusual outreach missions, bringing knowledge of the universe to those who otherwise have no access to such information. A newly minted resident of Pasadena, she was born in Waltrop, Germany, received her bachelor’s degree in physics and earth and space sciences at Jacobs University in Bremen and in October, 2015, received her Ph.D. in astrophysics at Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias on Spain’s Canary Islands. Earlier this year she finished a two-year postdoctoral fellowship at Carnegie Observatories in Pasadena, where her research focused on the formation of galaxies and the influence of dark matter. Seidel has just signed on as a scientist with Caltech’s IPAC division, which partners with NASA, JPL and the worldwide research community to advance exploration of the universe and provide information-outreach programs for the public.
We spoke with Seidel for this family and education issue not because of her career per se, but because of her distinctive extracurricular accomplishments, spreading what she has called “visions of the cosmos” near and far. Last summer, while pursuing her postdoctoral research, she organized a project for underserved schoolchildren here in Pasadena, so they could learn about the Great American Eclipse and then observe it through glasses and telescopes she had donated for the occasion. “Even in a place like California, resources can be scarce,” she said. “Some schools might not even have funds for a science teacher in certain grades. Cooperating with the Pasadena United Schools District [PUSD], we identified five schools that had a focus on STEM [science, technology, engineering and mathematics), but were located in underprivileged areas. The idea was to provide them with telescopes, education material and workshops to fully take advantage of the eclipse with their students and to possibly continue astronomy education at their schools.”
On one recent global expedition, Seidel and an ecologist friend traveled for two months by horseback and paraglider to remote villages in Colombia’s Andes. In their backpacks they carried telescopes, binoculars, inflatable models of the solar system, Play-Doh and other crafts items to help inspire villagers, particularly children, with the joy of discovery. Joy seems to be a key component in her outreach missions, which combine a love of nature and adventure sports with a passion for science. The aim of the Colombia project, titled “Cielo y Tierra (Heaven and Earth),” was not to hold formal classes in astronomy or ecology, she says, but simply to lead entertaining experiments and exchanges that open people’s minds to all the wonders out there for them to discover. Seidel’s own joie de vivre is evidenced in the short film of this odyssey at cieloytierra-project.com, which shows the two women gliding above the clouds, trekking on horses through spectacular terrain and connecting with villagers who may have no access to technology, may never have seen a telescope or binoculars before and have certainly never encountered young women scientists gliding down from the sky to explain our unique planet and its relationship to the heavens.
From Seidel’s profile page on a couch-surfing website, we learned that in addition to paragliding and horseback riding, she climbs mountains and volcanos, surfs, hikes, scuba dives, skydives, has a pilot’s license, plays saxophone, has been in several bands, plays “a bit of guitar,” speaks five languages, has lived in five countries and has visited 30, which she lists alphabetically.
We first contacted Seidel while she was working with Carnegie Observatory’s telescope in Chile’s Atacama Desert, then talked with her a few days later via Skype when she was visiting Germany.

You’ve written that even as a child, you knew you wanted to be an astronomer. Were your parents scientists, or how did that happen at such a young age?
My parents weren’t scientists. I think there were many triggers. It happened that at a very young age I experienced some comets, and then some other public observations, and so I started reading about astronomy at around 10 years. I actually started reading A Brief History of Time by Stephen Hawking and I didn’t understand much because I was so young still, but I found it very fascinating. Where I lived in Waltrop is densely populated, so the skies are not very clear, but when we went to more remote places during the holidays I could see the stars. And the light from the stars is basically millions and millions of years old — you are looking into the past of the universe. This was all fascinating, and so I started going to youth astronomy camps at about 15. The first was in Germany, then some international astronomy youth camps in the Czech Republic, Poland and other places.

When did you realize that science outreach was necessary, and you wanted to visit remote places to share your knowledge?
I have always had a passion to share what I’m doing. In high school and as an undergraduate I already was involved in social outreach activities, reaching out to communities with very low resources. This kind of led me to know that there is a need, that there are many people in this world who do not have the same starting position and a lot of things need to be done [to assist them]. I think education is a key to making society evolve, and astronomy is a very powerful visual tool to get people interested in science. You have a telescope and just let people observe, and then ask questions. Not that they, in the end, have to study astronomy, but just to get them curious about science and know there is so much out there to discover.
So going to remote areas was a decision made after doing some research on where NGOs [nongovernmental organizations] are going. I found there is a huge difference between urban and rural areas. There are not many organizations that go to remote and rural areas of developing countries. And in those areas, so many children still drop out of primary school because they are not encouraged to get an education. They’re told the only things they can do is to work in the fields or, in the worst case, go into drug trafficking. So that was something we wanted to address.

you’ve referred readers to Carl Sagan’s 1994 Pale Blue Dot book in some of your writing and talks. He says that astronomy is a humbling and character-building DIscipline that reminds us we are just this tiny planet spinning in one small galaxy among trillions of galaxies in a vast cosmos, and yet we’re the only place known so far to harbor life. Photographed from space, earth has no borders, no nationalities. We humans are all one species, and we have to take care of each other and of our planet or all hope is lost. You feel that’s relevant for today?
Yes, this is definitely my philosophy, and something that motivates me. I actually learned about Sagan’s Pale Blue Dot rather late, when I was already over 20, and I realized I had written down very similar thoughts. Astonomy offers a very different perspective on life here on earth. What we often do as an inquiry activity is build a solar system to scale…and we see how little the solar system is in our galaxy and how little our galaxy is compared to all the billions and billions of galaxies in the universe. This really gives a sense of scale and perspective and can lead to this feeling of global citizenship where you feel part of one humanity, which is on this little space ship called Earth. I definitely am convinced that if we do not start thinking that everyone on Earth is just one humanity, if we do not stop thinking about the differences between us, but about how similar we all actually are…and that from space, the earth is seen really without any physical borders…if we do not start thinking in that direction, then I don’t see that there’s a future for humanity.

Do you see much hope?
If we do start thinking that way, then yes. I think this is a very [assertive] step we must take as humans, to start thinking of us as one humanity. When I talk to businesspeople, I sometimes ask them: If you have a company and everyone works against each other in all the departments, does the company run well? No. So the departments all have to work together as one company. Well, the earth is like one company. We have to work together instead of against each other.

You visit these children in remote places, where they have so little formal education. I know you bring crafts and telescopes, but is it really possible to enlighten them about such complicated things as the solar system and our place in the universe?
It’s possible anywhere. Imagination is never limited just because your resources are limited. Everyone, even in the most remote areas, has a lot of imagination and dreams. I think when you learn about something like astronomy, you think, wow, this has changed me. Just because of this one experience, this one little match being lit, my life has changed. They can see there are lots of other opportunities and things to think about in life. Maybe different types of jobs they never imagined before. These people always have very interesting questions, and we are staying in touch with some of them and trying to train local collaborators where possible to continue the work.

If you had one thing to say to nonscientists, who rarely think about all this, what would it be?
Never stop being curious and surprised at what the universe might give you. And really start appreciating our planet’s place in the universe and how very special our planet is. Keep thinking about that!

Pea milk? Algae oil? Consider stocking your pantry with some of these brand-new foods that are good for you.

Think about it: Our food components haven’t really changed since Eve allegedly first bit into the apple. We’re all still living off the land, consuming products derived from plants and animals. Of course there are tremendous advances in what we consume and how we prepare it, many leading to better health and longevity. And trendy “new” items now seem to appear on an almost daily basis, making food as fad-driven as fashion.

Consider the endless iterations of exotic spices, grains and fruits that purportedly offer us essential nutrients. Now that we’ve all learned that quinoa is pronounced KEEN-wah, for example, the culinary cognoscenti have come up with even more obscure ancient grains they say are just as good or even better: farro, spelt, teff, fonio and kamut (a.k.a. Khorasan wheat), to name just a few coming to local markets.

And there’s a slew of new tools with which to prepare it all: slow and fast cookers, masticating juicers, air fryers, outdoor and indoor steam convection ovens. Foodies who recently spent a bundle building massive masonry pizza ovens as focal points for their outdoor kitchens are now presented with the newer trend toward lightweight, unimposing stainless-steel models. The Uuni 3 wood-fired oven claims to reach 932° in just 10 minutes and “can cook an authentic wood-fired pizza in an incredible 60 seconds.”  Better yet, it’s portable; you can tote it to your boat and your beach house!

Some of these new items will make it onto the list of enduring kitchen classics. Others will fade as fast as the micro-mini. Here’s a sampling of new food trends that may or may not hit the big-time — along with one truly significant game-changer that’s at the top of our list.

CLEAN MEAT

Neither fad nor trend, this is a revolution. Also known as “in vitro meat” or “cultured meat,” it’s meat and poultry grown in a lab from stem cells extracted from live animals, and it could start appearing on high-end restaurant menus by 2020. So-called “clean meat” is not fake or simulated meat, like the soy protein or veggie-based products in stores now. It’s the real deal, produced using technology from the medical field, and those who’ve tried samples say it tastes real because it is real. The only difference is that no animals are killed in the process.

Bill Gates and Richard Branson are reportedly heavy investors in some of the startup companies now working to make the world change from live to lab-produced steaks, chops, chickens, duck and other animal products. There are tech and regulatory issues to surmount, but industry experts predict that affordable clean meat will be in supermarkets by 2023. According to cleanmeat.org, the lab-grown product is “100 percent real meat, but without the antibiotics, E. coli, salmonella or waste contamination that comes with conventional meat production.” And, according to United Nations scientists, this new method of meat production would eliminate the huge environmental hazards and extensive depletion of natural resources that come with raising animals for food.

CANNABIS SUPERFOODS

Anxiety, insomnia, chronic pain, lessened immunity and low energy are just a few of the ailments that cannabis proponents say the superweed can help alleviate. And now that about 30 states have legalized recreational or medicinal marijuana, dozens of cannabis-infused foods and drinks are flooding markets. The Specialty Foods Association calls cannabis edibles a top food trend for 2018, with teas, olive oils, nuts, energy bars, coffee, crackers, honey and alcohol-free wines and beers among foods being compounded with cannabis. There are even cannabis-infused dog and cat treats for four-footed family members.

Most of the new hemp-infused products contain one or both primary cannabinoids (CBD and THC) that are said to provide health benefits. Edibles with only CBD are legal in all 50 states because they are non-psychoactive, which means they won’t give consumers a high. Those with THC will produce a buzz, depending on the amount. (One package of Mota Beef Jerky delivers 100 mg of THC; compare that to a Leafly Cherry Almond Tart, which has 13 mg of CBD and only 5 mg of buzz-producing THC.) The Los Angeles restaurant Shibumi has a CBD cannabis menu that includes tempura fried cannabis, cannabis kimchi and pork smoked with cannabis branches.

VEGGIE MILK

If you’re unimpressed with nondairy milks made from almonds, rice, soy, coconut and cashew, there’s yet another replacement for cow’s milk that’s trending now. It’s called “pea milk” or “veggie milk,” and it’s made from peas, potatoes and tapioca. Makers say it’s a boon not just for the lactose-intolerant, but also those with nut allergies. A number of brands are available, all claiming to be dairy-, nut- and-soy-free; they’re also not genetically modified. Why peas? Because veggie milk–makers say peas are packed with protein, a good source of calcium and vitamins D and B12. Pea milk reportedly has a consistency close to that of two percent milk, and it comes in flavors, including unsweetened and chocolate.

ALGAE OIL

The folks at the Terra Via company in San Francisco have come out with Thrive Algae Oil for cooking, baking and salad dressing. Algae may sound icky to those who learned in science class about its contribution to pond scum. But there’s a vast and varied world of algae, some of them not just helpful, but critical, to our existence, thanks to the role they play in food products, pharmaceuticals, fertilizer, bioplastics,biofuels and more.  The company calls algae “the mother of all plants and earth’s original superfood.”  It claims their algae cooking oil has 75 percent less saturated fat than olive oil, and the highest levels of good, monounsaturated fat of all oils used for cooking. What’s more, it has an unusually high smoke point, which makes it great for frying and sautéeing. Sourced from the sap of a chestnut tree, the algae is fermented in huge sterile vats where it’s converted into oil.

CHICKPEA CONCOCTIONS

Long a staple at salad bars and the backbone of hummus, the garbanzo has now been elevated to an elegant snack food and has also found its way into all sorts of edibles, from protein bars to pasta and peanut butter. Like other legumes, such as beans and lentils, chickpeas are high in fiber and protein and contain several key vitamins and minerals. Considered a healthy snack substitute for chips, bags of crispy, roasted garbanzos are spiked with wasabi, ranch, honey and other flavors. And now garbanzos have even gone sweet. Biena Snacks coats the crunchy beans in light or dark chocolate or salted caramel. Their newest is the Thin Mint chickpea snack, with flavor licensed from the folks who make Girl Scout cookies. The crisped beans are coated in dark chocolate and Thin Mint cookie dough.

JPL Senior Research Scientist Bonnie Buratti talks about traveling to the great beyond.

Bonnie J. Buratti was working in Rome when we called to chat on International Women’s Day, which celebrates women’s accomplishments. She is certainly among Arroyoland’s (and the nation’s) superbly accomplished women. Buratti is a planetary astronomer at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, where she is a senior research scientist supervising the Comets, Asteroids and Satellites Group.
She is currently analyzing data from the completed Cassini-Huygens mission to Saturn, for which she earned NASA’s Exceptional Achievement Medal. She’s also working on the agency’s New Horizons mission to Pluto and its moons, and is the U.S. Project scientist for the European Space Agency’s Rosetta mission, the first spacecraft to soft-land a robot on a comet. In 2014 Buratti, who advises NASA, was elected chair of the American Astronomical Society’s Division for Planetary Sciences, and she’s a Fellow of the American Geophysical Union. The International Astronomical Union even named asteroid 90503 “Buratti” in recognition of her work.
In addition to all that, Buratti recently wrote a book for nonscientists who yearn to learn about what’s happening out of this world and in the great beyond. Worlds Fantastic, Worlds Familiar (Cambridge University Press) is a densely packed compendium of modern space exploration throughout the solar system — explaining Mercury, Venus, Mars, comets, asteroids, exoplanets and more — while describing what it all looks like, how they evolved, how we found out about them and who were the people involved. It’s also peppered with wit, personal anecdotes and historical oddities, zooming back to the ancients and into the future as new discoveries alter our understanding of Earth’s place in the universe and the possibilities lurking that we are not alone.
The Altadena resident has been married for 36 years to Cal Poly Pomona physics professor and author Kai S. Lam. They have three grown sons. Buratti holds numerous degrees — a B.S. and M.S. in Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences from MIT and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Astronomy and Space Sciences from Cornell University. We asked her to talk about her life and work.

At 65, you seem to be speeding up instead of slowing down. In many corporate settings, there’s a lot of ageism, especially toward women. Have you experienced that in the science world?
I’ve never thought about it. I know it exists elsewhere, but I would say in science, that’s not true. In science, as you get older, whether you’re a man or a woman, you just gain more knowledge.

So it’s acknowledged that a competent scientist becomes more competent with age?
Exactly.
Some publicity for your book mentions that you write about science from a woman’s perspective. What has gender to do with how a scientist works?
You’ve hit on kind of a controversial subject. Women are perfectly capable of doing science the same as men. That’s very important. There’s no particular women’s way. The most convincing argument in that arena is that women, because of their upbringing, quite often are more cooperative. We tend to be able to work as a team; whereas men might want to get credit, women more easily cooperate together. This is based on our training. It has nothing to do with our ability, but with the way it’s implemented.

You’re in Rome for Cassini, which ended its 20-year journey to Saturn in 2017. What are you working on there?
We’re still doing research, focused on archiving and on legacy, getting everything we’ve learned packaged. I have overall responsibility for the moons of Saturn. My particular interest is in what they are made of. Like, if you were standing on the surface, what would you see? What is their shape, their composition, what is the physical nature of these moons?

Two of those moons seem to have astonished scientists because they are so unexpectedly Earth-like in geology and climate. Do they
enlarge the possibility that there are other worlds where some form of life might exist?
Yes. Before the mission we simply saw the moons as pinpoints of light. The Cassini mission turned them into real worlds. On the small moon Enceladus, for example, we discovered a plume of water, a geyser, basically. We discovered lakes on Titan, not of water but of methane and ammonia — the only place in the solar system other than Earth where there is a standing body of liquid.

Elon Musk recently sent a cherry-red Tesla into space blaring David Bowie and carrying a mannequin named Starman at the wheel. That caused scientists at Purdue University and elsewhere to worry that the car might not be “clean” enough, and might contaminate Mars with earthly bacteria. NASA deliberately crashed Cassini into Saturn when its mission ended so it wouldn’t roam uncontrolled and perhaps contaminate areas that should be kept pristine for further exploration. Is NASA concerned about contamination from Musk’s Tesla and other potential privately-owned space launches?
NASA has a very strict protocol for what’s known as planetary protection. Anytime you put anything into space, you have to do rigorous planetary protection analysis. Musk and SpaceX are not working for NASA. Theirs are not NASA activities. I think NASA was concerned about it and I think the possibility that it might affect Mars was small and unlikely. But they did not do the analysis that NASA would have done. I really can’t comment on all that. There’s another concern that many scientists have, and that is that putting a Tesla in space is an advertising event, whereas we would have liked to see a scientific payload instead, something that had instruments and could study the space environment.

You’ve worked on so many different projects. Do you have a favorite planet?
Good question. It’s a really close call between Titan and Pluto.
Is Titan a planet? I thought it was a moon of Saturn.
Well no, it’s not a planet. Neither is Pluto, technically, for that matter. The International Astronomical Union downgraded it to a dwarf planet in 2006. But we scientists don’t think in terms of what we should call [a celestial body]. We’re not concerned with that.

So why are Titan and Pluto your favorites?
Titan is the most Earthlike of celestial bodies. It has lakes. It has evidence there were glaciers in the past. It has running rivers, a thick atmosphere and a lot of landforms that look like Earth’s. It has clouds and seasons and very interesting objects. And Pluto is so much more than we expected. It is the first object in the solar system on which we found active geysers. We see evidence of something melted, and what looks like something flowing over it that we don’t understand yet. It looks like snow has occurred.

Similarities between Earth and other planets is one theme of your book. Can you talk about that?
A lot of phenomena we see on Earth are replicated on the planets. Take, for example, the greenhouse effect, the warming of Earth’s climate due to the influx of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. That happened on Venus already. Venus had oceans in its history. Because of the unconstrained accumulation of carbons, a runaway greenhouse effect evaporated all the oceans. They all disappeared. It became a very hot world. So that is kind of an extreme case of what is happening on Earth right now.
Mars is also similar to Earth. It started out wetter. There were oceans in its early history. We think the origin of life on Mars may have been similar to origins of life on Earth. So the search for life on Mars is part of the search for life as it would have been on early Earth.

Are we any closer to discovering the origins of human life?
We really aren’t. We’re putting a lot of effort into that because it’s one of the greatest questions to be answered.

Your book has some nail-biting moments of tension and excitement, as various missions make fantastic discoveries. It’s a kind of Indiana Jones tale that takes place in space. You also write about the poetry of science. How would you explain all this to an ace science student who’s trying to decide on a career?
The book isn’t for scientists. It’s for the public to help explain space science, which is a heritage of the American people and belongs to all of them. I also really wanted to show younger people — those who are high school level and above — how much fun science is, and motivate them to do the kinds of things I do. It doesn’t have to be space science, but any of the other types, like engineering or helping to solve the climate problem.
Science is poetic in the sense that it’s about having a new idea, a great idea. When we get that flash of insight, it’s very similar to the insight flash you get in any artistic or creative endeavor. I’d say to be a great scientist, you really have to study everything, not just science. I think it was the Greek philosopher Terence who said, “Let nothing that is human be alien to you.” You have to just expand your mind to take ideas from every area you can take them. Of course, it’s 99 percent perspiration and 1 percent inspiration. But at the moment you finally make that sublime discovery, you know it has all been worth it.

Any comment on President Trump’s idea for a space force, a branch of the military trained to fight wars in space?
The U.S. is a signatory to the Outer Space Treaty, which states (Article IV): “The Moon and other celestial bodies shall be used by all States Parties to the Treaty exclusively for peaceful purposes. The establishment of military bases, installations and fortifications, the testing of any type of weapons and the conduct of military maneuvers on celestial bodies shall be forbidden.”

With all scientists now know, do you believe there’s a possibility of intelligent life somewhere out there in space?
I just don’t know. We shouldn’t be the only ones, but we haven’t found any evidence of any life elsewhere, let alone intelligent life.

The president’s budget proposal will have a big impact on the elderly if Congress adopts it

Apresidential budget is a statement of principle, a road map to an administration’s policy goals and its ideal funding levels for specific departments. And President Trump’s budget priorities would have a big impact on seniors in the coming decade if adopted by Congress. Here’s what you need to know:
Trump’s proposal would reportedly cut funding to many departments the elderly depend on. It would cut the Health and Human Services Department, which oversees all federal healthcare programs, by 20.3 percent, which would cut 30 percent of the budget for food stamps (now known as SNAP), introducing “food packages” instead of the current debit cards that can be used at markets. Also targeted for cuts of hundreds of billions of dollars are Medicare and Medicaid (which benefit one-third of all Americans); much of the federal healthcare budget would become the responsibility of individual states, which are already struggling to meet residents’ needs.
The proposal would also cut multiple programs many financially challenged seniors currently count on, such as heating and housing assistance. It would slash certain prescription drug benefits and prohibit Medicare from fully negotiating directly with pharmaceutical companies, which experts agree is the most effective way to bring prices down. Millions of older people could wind up paying more than they currently do for prescription drugs, analysts say, and fewer medications might be covered.
On the plus side, Trump’s proposal would eliminate the 5 percent co-pay for sick seniors who reach the “catastrophic” drug-cost threshold. But it would also become more difficult to qualify for that level of coverage, and those just under the threshold would reportedly pay more than before. Social Security’s retirement and survivor benefit payments would not be cut, although the department’s staff would be slashed at a time when 10,000 baby boomers a day are reaching retirement age. And for those staffers who remain, the overtime allotted to keep up with that increased demand has been cut to less than one-third of what was allowed in 2017. Senior advocates worry that the staffing decreases signal a goal to eventually dismantle or completely privatize the Social Security program.
The president’s plan would also make it more difficult for physicians to refer Medicare patients to other providers, some analysts say, making it harder for some seniors to access care their doctors recommend. And the proposed 2019 budget includes elimination of community development block grants, a program that helps local governments take on serious community-wide problems, such as affordable housing and meal delivery services to the housebound and isolated, including Meals on Wheels.
Americans across the political spectrum have spoken out against the proposed cuts, which seem to herald a change in America’s basic policy toward its seniors, who are living and working longer than ever before and may be counting on their country to deliver on its promises. Conservative writer Jennifer Rubin, whose Right Turn blog appears in the Washington Post, has written: “Despite having become the governing party, Republicans still show little interest or competence in governing with a broad-based vision of what quaintly used to be called the ‘public good.’” The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), a nonpartisan think tank based in Washington, D.C., has also denounced the administration’s proposed budget.
Trump’s proposal likely won’t be enacted this year since Congress just passed a two-year spending program. But the CBPP says it “shows what he would seek to achieve over the remainder of his administration” (although Democratic inroads in the 2018 midterm elections would likely pose a big obstacle). Seniors would be among the millions more Americans who would lose health insurance coverage under the proposed health-care cuts criticized by the CBPP, increasing hardships for low- and moderate-income families.
Millions of seniors and those approaching retirement have amassed enough assets to assure themselves a financially comfortable old age. Many more millions who may have worked just as long and hard are financially insecure. Half of Medicare recipients live on incomes of under $26,200 a year and lack the resources for their basic needs, according to the National Council on Aging based in Arlington, VA. In the perfect storm of more deregulation, skyrocketing costs for housing, food and medical care, many middle-class Americans face a troubled financial existence once they are too old to work, analysts say.
Here are just a few random facts that highlight the costs of survival for American seniors: The national average annual rate for a semi-private room in a nursing home was $81,030 in 2012, according to the MetLife Mature Market Institute. That does not even include all the extra therapies, medicines and special care often required during such a stay. Basic Medicare does not cover hearing aids or dental work, both of which are costly and afflict the elderly more than any other group. About 5 million older Americans rely on SNAP for food while making ends meet. Most live alone, and on average receive $108 per month to help put food on the table.
The question becomes one of basic national philosophy rather than one of political party preference: How should we treat our oldest citizens? Do we penalize those who have worked all their lives, but not been able to amass the funds needed to survive a lengthy illness — or simply survive? Some respected analysts say such questions are irrelevant. They contend that it’s economically unfeasible, given the tremendous rise in older Americans now flooding the population, to continue providing seniors with the traditional entitlements. Others assert there’s enough money to continue and even improve support for old people, if only we set different priorities than this budget’s authors do. They say the government has faced similar challenges over the years, but with both parties working together to make changes that assure the programs’ solvency, those problems have always been solved. They say the same can happen now.

WHAT YOU GET FOR…

Area real estate experts say the seesaw stockmarket and bouncy consumer confidence stats have not affected the housing market here. They predict that the good times (for sellers) will continue to roll. Housing inventory and interest rates are at a low ebb; with so little on the market, multiple offers on desirable homes keep prices escalating. They’re not talking about McMansions, which take longer to sell, but about quality moderate-size homes in quality neighborhoods. In Pasadena’s leafy Linda Vista neighborhood, for example, there’s virtually nothing under $1 million, and even the smallest homes there can cost a few hundred thousand more than that. So it’s still a seller’s market, Realtors say, because there are so few properties to choose from and so many competitive offers. (For tax reform’s negative impact on housing prices, see page 13.)
Many hundreds of people have visited a meticuously upgraded midcentury modern house in Glendale’s Whiting Woods area, says Realtor Valerie Levitt Halsey of Berkshire Hathaway Home Services. “We’re really in no hurry to sell,” she says. “We want everyone to get a chance to see it, and we’ve set a date on which all offers should be submitted.” Interest is exceptionally high in an area like this, she says, because so many buyers are seeking well-built family homes in the peaceful woodsy residential neighborhoods the area is noted for. In Whiting Woods, she says, the setting is bucolic, schools are good and homes rarely come on the market. “People tend to buy their forever homes there, and settle in for decades. It’s a big challenge under current market conditions, especially for those trying to set themselves up to get a good education for their kids. There’s so little to choose from, and so many more buyers than there are properties. And that keeps prices going up.”
Would-be buyers who already own a home and want to move to a bigger or smaller one face the trickiest situation, Realtors say. “It’s hard to figure out how to sell your current home and buy your next home successfully in this market,” Halsey says. “If you need the equity from selling your home in order to buy your next home, you have a problem. The great properties that people want are so competitive that if you haven’t sold your house yet, you can’t make an offer competitive enough to buy the new home. Someone else will snap it up. And if you sell your house before buying a new one, you have no idea how long it will take to find that right new home, and then make the winning bid. You’re faced with having to rent for an unknown amount of time. This is a problem we’ve been seeing and lots of us are talking about.”
While most top Arroyoland residential neighborhoods have remained architecturally intact thanks to Pasadena’s fervent preservation community, there are signs that is slowly changing — already massive homes are being enlarged or torn down and replaced with something even larger, introducing architectural styles that are anything but the hallowed traditional style of the neighborhood. An example is a newly constructed home in La Caňada Flintridge, which Rita Benelian, a Realtor with Keller Williams’ West Hollywood office, calls “an entertainer’s dream home,” with one level that’s an extraordinary “man cave” that would have suited the Rat Pack. The upper levels are traditional in design, the kind of home you might find in Beverly Hills or Doheny Estates, she says. But “it would be about $20 million if it were on the Westside,” she adds. Because it’s in La Caňada, it’s what she calls a real bargain.
Condominiums with spacious open floor plans are having a heyday in Arroyoland, Realtors say, not just because prices can be more affordable, but also because increasing numbers of people are deciding to embrace the freer lifestyle that comes with owning a condo. Realtor Ryan Sarkissian, with Compass Pasadena, says that much the same situation exists for condos as for private homes. “There’s not a lot on the market now in an affordable price range, in good condition and that has a nice, spacious layout,” he notes. “Prices are escalating for condos, because so many buyers have so little to choose from.” And when something good comes on the market, he notes, the bidding competition will be stiff, the price will go up and it will go fast.
Following is a sampling of what you can get for your money:

What you get for…

$500,000

1127 E. Del Mar Blvd., #334
Pasadena
2 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1,283 square feet
This light-filled corner condo is on the building’s top floor. It has an open floor plan, a fireplace and a balcony. Windows are dual pane and energy-efficient, and the common areas of the entire Casa Pasadena complex are being updated with new landscaping and hardscaping. The complex has a clubhouse, pool, spa and gym. Pets are permitted with some restrictions on dog size. This condo was listed at $540,000 but went under contract for $585,000, as Arroyo went to press.

Strategies for homeowners to protect their assets from the growing threat of wildfires

“There was a desert wind blowing that night. It was one of those hot dry Santa Anas that come down through the mountain passes and curl your hair and make your nerves jump and your skin itch. On nights like that every booze party ends in a fight. Meek little wives feel the edge of the carving knife and study their husbands’ necks. Anything can happen.”

That’s how Raymond Chandler described Santa Anas in his 1938 novella “Red Wind.” And when the dry winds arrive, wildfires often arrive with them. Aptly named, they pounce like raging bulls, erratic and unpredictable, depending on wind direction and severity. It’s been happening since long before there were humans here to lament or write about them.

In the beginning, the fires were spontaneous eruptions every 30 to 130 years; they were nature’s way of preserving the valleys’ foothill greenbelts which depended upon fire to regenerate and flourish. Nowadays, wildfires happen every year with increasing frequency and severity, and 95 percent of them are caused by humans rather than nature. Experts predict that extended periods of high temperatures combined with continuing lack of rain will cancel out the seasonal aspect of wildfire danger and replace it with a year-round threat to life and what many count as their largest asset — their home. Governor Jerry Brown recently said that we have to start assuming that fire season will go right through Christmas.

Much of Arroyoland is considered by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire) to be in the highest category of risk for ignition. Pasadena, Duarte, Glendale, La Caňada Flintridge and Monrovia are all tagged as Very High Fire Hazard Severity (VHFS) zones. In 1993, 115 homes burned in the Eaton Canyon area of Altadena, with embers from that fire setting off flames that burned a dozen homes in Pasadena and Glendale. In 2009, the Station Fire threatened 12,000 structures, mostly in Pasadena, La Cañada Flintridge, Glendale, La Crescenta and Altadena. It came within one eighth of a mile of Jet Propulsion Labs and destroyed 89 nearby homes and 120 other structures. The cause was arson.

We were lucky to avoid damage from last December’s multiple fires, the largest ever recorded in Southern California history (although a brush fire scorched 50 acres near Mt. Wilson just last October). Such disasters were once attributed to building homes in or near wildfire-prone areas, but that explanation no longer holds true. Stephen Pyne, a wildfire historian who’s written 30 books on the subject, told the Los Angeles Times last October: “It’s no longer just the case that we’re building homes where the fires are. The fires seem to be going where the houses are.”

Financial losses are the least of our worries when we wake in the middle of the night to firefighters pounding on our door, telling us to get out quickly. In the recent fires, some families had minutes or even seconds to evacuate before their homes ignited or exit roads were blocked. We’ve all read stories of those who couldn’t even corral their pets in time to save them. The financial aftermath comes later, afflicting those who’ve lost everything and haven’t fully prepared for such eventualities.

No matter how well we try to protect our property, we’re all somewhat vulnerable. So how do you prepare for such an event, which may occur months or years from now, or may never happen? And what do you take with you if you have to leave in a hurry?

DO THIS NOW, BEFORE DISASTER STRIKES.

Many experts weighed in on this subject after last year’s fires around California. Their suggestions are worth noting — they’ll stand you in good stead whether you’re confronted with fire or any other kind of catastrophic event that requires you to leave your home quickly.

l. Read your home insurance policy carefully.

Don’t assume that your agent, who may be very capable, has covered you correctly.   There are hundreds of sad stories from fire victims of every economic bracket who trusted they were completely covered for rebuilding but found out otherwise — when it was too late. Many were short more than $100,000 in rebuilding costs, some in the hundreds of thousands. Some could not afford to rebuild.

Your policy should not simply cover the value of your home; it should cover all costs of rebuilding it according to current codes. “Roughly 60 percent of American homes are underinsured,” according to CoreLogic, an Irvine-based company that provides data to home insurers. Amy Bach, director at United Policyholders, a San Francisco–based nonprofit representing consumers, calls it “a huge problem.” Consumers rely on their agents, who sometimes rely on formulas that do not cover costs, she says. Sometimes even the most reliable agents simply make mistakes.

Also, if you’ve updated or added onto any part of your home (such as a kitchen or deck), report that to your insurance agent. Homeowners who fail to update after making improvements are in for problems, says Janet Ruiz of the Insurance Information Institute trade group in New York.

2. Pack an evacuation bag (sometimes called a grab-and-go kit) with all your important documents, so you can quickly take them in an emergency.

It should contain birth certificates, passports, social security cards, property titles, home insurance policy, crucial health cards and records, any critical papers. You may think some of these are easily replaceable, but in chaotic times it could take weeks or months, and you’ll need many of them immediately after any disaster. You’ll want the home insurance policy to ensure you get proper coverage if you’re filing a claim with your insurer or FEMA, especially since adjusters will be overworked and rushed.

Digitize as many important documents as you can and keep a hard drive in the kit or make sure they’re available online. If you have old, irreplaceable family photos, you might send them and any important videos to be scanned and transferred to DVDs, which can be stored in a safety deposit box.

Take a video of your home including all furniture, art and belongings. This will be essential for insurance purposes. You might even want to video the inside of clothing drawers and closets if you have lots of stuff. One survivor of the 2003 San Diego fire told the L.A. Times that in order to receive insurance money, “she had to figure out how many T-shirts were in her drawers and what canned goods were in her cupboard.” Paula Baker, whose home was destroyed, told the paper: “It was exhausting. You have to make a lot of very big decisions financially and otherwise at a time when your mind is kind of reeling.”

3. In another kit, keep a change of underwear and clothes, toiletries, a supply of medications, extra prescription glasses or contact lenses and perhaps any small irreplaceable jewelry or heirlooms you would not want to live without.

Make a list in advance of other irreplaceable items you’d take depending on the time you have to evacuate and space you have in your vehicle. If there’s little time, grab your essential kits and go. If there’s more time, grab the items you’ve prioritized.

4. Don’t forget to set aside a stash of cash.

It’s key in times of disaster, and you want to have a good amount on hand in one of your kits.

5. If you have pets, keep a bag of food, pet meds and other essentials near your document and clothing kits.

You can rotate the food and meds, so they don’t become outdated.

6. Plan on exactly what electronics you want to take — phone, laptops, tablets.

And keep extra cords and chargers in your kit.

AFTER THE DISASTER

1. Keep a detailed journal starting the day of the wildfire, flood or any disaster that hits your home.

Consumer advocates say meticulous notes will help the insurance claim process go more speedily and accurately. A diary should be updated daily with the dates, times and names of those you spoke with by phone or met with, including insurers, adjusters and contractors, plus a brief entry of what was said. Keep an envelope with all receipts that document your living expenses from the time you had to evacuate. According to Amy Bach of United Policyholders, receipts for temporary housing and other living expenses will document your additional living costs that are reimbursable.

2. Even if your house has been totally destroyed, it is essential that you take pictures of the damage.

If it’s too painful, Bach says, ask a friend or relative to do it for you. Such photos, even if they show only a remaining foundation, can help indicate the size and shape of the home and damage sustained.

Above all, be vigilant when dealing with the aftermath of a wildfire or other disaster. Remember, when you’re dealing with claims adjusters and agents who are burdened with dozens or hundreds of cases under time pressure, you need to be your own best advocate.

Critics warn that Silicon Valley may be undermining democracy and stifling independent thought

Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos and Larry Page needn’t panic — yet. But alarm bells are ringing across the land, alerting Americans to the fact that almost every aspect of their lives has been captured, catalogued, digitized and monetized by Google, Amazon and Facebook. Not just what we buy and where, but what we think and with whom we share those thoughts. Those very personal predilections have become data the Big Three can use to target and manipulate individuals and industries in order to gain more control and bigger profits. They already control much of our access to knowledge, entertainment and social media, and they’re branching out from there.
No one can dispute the intoxicating ease and speed with which we can now buy things (Amazon), acquire information (Google) and communicate globally (Facebook). But the very titans of tech who’ve made all this wonderful stuff possible now head the globe’s three largest and most powerful monopolies. There are no regulations curbing their bigness or business practices, and some observers liken them to sovereign nations. Known abroad as GAFA (when Apple is included with Google, Amazon and Facebook), they are accused of diminishing democracy and actually messing with our brains by invisibly eroding free will, individuality and the capacity for independent thought.
Critics blame them for narrowing our intellectual options and stifling human creativity in various ways: Facebook is under fire for disseminating fake news (as is becoming clearer with media investigations of Russian ad purchases to sway the 2016 election) and its manipulation of which news and posts users are allowed to see; Google does it by using algorithms to curate what is presented when we search for information of any sort; and Amazon has an overwhelming hold on the retail market for books and much more.
Their concentration of power has overtaken online life, and in the process has deflated entire industries. Since 2001, newspaper and music revenues have fallen 70 percent; film and television profits have also taken dramatic downturns. Jonathan Taplin, an author, film producer and director emeritus of the Annenberg Innovation Lab at USC’s School for Communication and Journalism, writes about the phenomenon in his recent book, Move Fast and Break Things: How Facebook, Google and Amazon Cornered Culture and Undermined Democracy (Little, Brown & Co.). He argues that the Big Three have tolerated piracy of books, music and film while at the same time subordinating the privacy of individuals “to create the surveillance marketing monoculture in which we now live.” Intellectual property and the written word have been devalued in this culture, say critics, who point to the decline of principled journalism against the rise of news stories and blogs written not to inform readers but to titillate as clickbait that produces revenue for Facebook and Google. The tale of a Minnesota hunter who killed a lion named Cecil in Zimbabwe, for example, resulted in 3.2 million Google News results while many more important issues were thinly covered.
If all the above sounds like overwrought hyperbole, you’re right. It does sound that way. But just look at where those companies began, and where they are now. And consider several new books on the subject: Taplin’s Move Fast and Break Things is described by the publisher as a “stinging polemic that traces the destructive monopolization of the Internet by Google, Facebook and Amazon.” World Without Mind: The Existential Threat of Big Tech (Penguin Press) by Franklin Foer was reviewed by tech scholar Tim Wu as “nothing less than an examination of the future of humanity and what we like to call free will.” And Scott Galloway’s The Four: The Hidden DNA of Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google (Portfolio) discusses how “these four most influential companies on the planet are unlike the altruistic image they project and are gross manipulators of the fundamental emotional needs that have driven humans since our ancestors lived in caves.”
How could such seemingly benevolent companies wreak such havoc? Here’s a short, surface overview: We live in an era of big data and algorithms. Data is the new oil — it’s how the Big Three fuel their businesses. We give information away for free with every click, tweet, post, selfie, “like” and card swipe. Every time we do anything online, on any device, we leave a digital trace that is stored and becomes data about each of us. Even offline, the motion sensors on our phones reveal where, how often and how far we travel. These kajillions of pieces of information form a psycho-demographic profile of our lives — what we believe, what we like, where we go, what we buy, how we are likely to vote. The companies collect the data invisibly and harness it via algorithms they design. The algorithms sort and organize the data automatically, selecting what content should be displayed to a user, what should be hidden and how it should be presented. We don’t always choose what we see online. It’s frequently chosen for us.
Facebook, for example, reportedly bases its algorithms selecting which news stories to feature most prominently in a user’s feed on data harvested about that user — such as the brands he or she follows and the content of posts from his/her friends. Amazon recommends books based on data about you and what you’ve read before, and there are dozens of other examples of algorithms leading toward what has been called a hive mentality. That occurs when people gravitate (or are pushed) to smaller and smaller spheres of opinion and intellect because they only get more of the kind of content they’ve already shown a preference for. Or, as Franklin Foer writes in World Without Mind, “Our era is defined by polarization, warring ideological gangs that yield no ground…Facebook has nurtured two hive minds, each residing in an informational ecosystem that yields head-nodding agreement and penalizes dissenting views…Facebook mines our data to keep giving us the news and information we crave, creating a feedback loop that pushes us deeper and deeper into our own amen corners.”
None of this is totally new. We all seem to have decided to ignore the seemingly small incursions because these three behemoths have brought us so much that is good. But lack of regulation has decimated many rights and privileges we’ve always taken for granted. Facebook has already bragged it can get out the vote by simply urging users to go to the polls, according to The New York Times. Combine that with its ability to misinform via fake news planted by agents hostile to one political side or the other, and the potential for a manipulated outcome becomes clearer. Facebook can invisibly influence its 2 billion users in other ways, as well. In 2014, for example, it announced it had done a psychological experiment on half a million randomly selected users, without their knowledge or consent, to determine if emotions can be spread. The company said it had altered the number of positive and negative posts in the newsfeeds of those selected. Half the users received more positive posts, the other half more negative ones. Results indicated that moods are contagious. Those who saw more positive posts responded by writing positive posts of their own. Those who saw more negative content responded with negative posts. Ponder the implications of that.
Google was also bruised in 2016, when news surfaced that searches using certain words — such as African-Americans, Jews and Hitler — with the company’s autocomplete system brought up racist and anti-Semitic sites; top entries included pages claiming that black people were not as smart as white, the Holocaust never happened and Hitler was a good person. Google blamed it on hate groups that had gamed its algorithms and said it had fixed the problem, according to The Guardian.
U.S. Senator Mark Warner (D-VA.), vice-chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee investigating Russia’s ties to the 2016 election, has said, “Facebook knows more about each of us than the U.S. government. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg.” The same could be said of Google and Amazon, say big-tech observers who claim that the companies probably know more about us than our own parents, siblings and spouses. Maybe even more than we know about ourselves.
Should they have access to all our information, to use as they choose? Should they be regulated as monopolies by the government, as some have suggested? Is it possible that ongoing revelations about how they operate will turn users toward smaller, newer online entities with different operating procedures? Time will tell, experts say. Here’s some brief information about where the big three began and where they are now. (Net worth figures are from Forbes):
Amazon started out selling books and is now the globe’s biggest online store for nearly everything. It also powers a cloud storage system used by Netflix, the CIA, Unilever, Dow Jones, Harvard, NASA, Spotify and dozens of the biggest corporations. Amazon also owns Whole Foods and the influential Washington Post. Its founder, chairman and CEO, Jeff Bezos, 53, is worth $86.3 billion.
Google started out with a goal of organizing and making available all the earth’s knowledge. In 2015, it was restructured as a subsidiary of Alphabet Inc., a multinational corporation which is parent to Google and a host of other entities making drones, phones and driverless cars; also in Alphabet’s portfolio is Calico, a biotech company that aims to eliminate aging and conquer death, among other ambitious aspirations. That’s a goal of Google cofounders Larry Page, Alphabet’s CEO, who is 44 years old and worth $45.7 billion, and Sergey Brin, Alphabet’s president, also 44 and worth $45.4 billion.
Facebook was famously started in a Harvard dorm room as a college networking tool. It now owns 50 tech companies that deal with everything from facial recognition to market analytics. Facebook owns Oculus VR (virtual-reality hardware and software), Instagram (a photo-sharing website) and WhatsApp (a messaging app that’s bigger than Facebook in India and other emerging markets; it reportedly has 450 million users, with 1 million new ones signing up daily). Facebook has 2 billion users worldwide; WhatsApp and Messenger each have 1.2 billion users. Founder Mark Zuckerberg is 33 and worth $70.6 billion.

Arts philanthropists Kiki and David Gindler donated $1 million toward the new Glendale theater that bears their name.

Los Angeles has the Getty and the Geffen, both on the Westside. And now, the newest G-space for the arts is here in Arroyoland: it’s the Gindler in Glendale. Technically, the building is named the Kiki & David Gindler Performing Arts Center. It was created as the home of the Antaeus Theatre Company, which had outgrown its old North Hollywood digs and was lucky enough to have a pair of generous benefactors; the Gindlers donated $1 million to help build a space for this acting ensemble whose work they’ve ardently admired and long supported.

Most who attend the new theater will not know much about the couple for whom it was christened. Gindler is not (yet) a household name, like Geffen and Getty. But in philanthropy circles, they’re being hailed as emerging “top supporters of the arts in Los Angeles,” according to Inside Philanthropy magazine. And in Glendale, they’ve been praised by civic leaders for weaving a vibrant new arts space into the fabric of Glendale’s urban life and for enhancing the city’s role as an arts and entertainment destination.

The new arts center sits across the street from the Americana at Brand, not far from the iconic Alex Theatre and the remodeled public library. Its interior is a flexible, multi- use space that includes an 80-seat theater, a reconfigurable performance/classroom space, a theater-classics library and a large lobby that doubles as an art gallery. It’s a gift that will keep on giving, civic leaders say, because Antaeus offers community involvement programs as well as great performances of plays with enduring themes that will resonate for generations to come.

So who are the Gindlers, and what makes them tick? And why did they choose Glendale for the new arts center when they live in Hancock Park, except when they’re at their homes in Montecito or New York? They’ve been married for 31 years; both are attorneys, both actively work to advance the music and theater arts on both coasts and together they have an eclectic flair for finding and funding unheralded small arts groups along with large, well-established ones. Philanthropy trackers say the couple — she’s 55, he’s 57 — have given hundreds of thousands of dollars in unpublicized donations over the past few years, as well as $1 million grants to the L.A. Master Chorale, the L.A. Philharmonic and Center Theatre Group. Each sits on multiple boards related to the arts.

In 2015, Kiki Ramos Gindler became the first Latina president of the Board of Directors of Center Theatre Group, one of the country’s largest nonprofit regional theater organizations. She also serves on the boards of the Music Center and L.A. Opera (CTG’s parent and sister organizations, respectively) as well as Pomona College. Her memberships also include the advisory committee to the L.A. County Arts Commission Cultural Equity and Inclusion Initiative and the National Council for the American Theatre, an advisory committee for the country’s regional theaters, which meets in New York. After earning degrees from Pomona College and Harvard Law School, she practiced corporate and entertainment law until she left to focus on philanthropy.

David Gindler is a senior partner at the law firm of Irell & Manella, where he’s carved out a reputation as one of the country’s leading experts in intellectual property litigation and licensing, with emphasis on complex patent disputes in life sciences, biotechnology, medical devices, computer architecture and microprocessor design. When not at work, he serves as chairman of the boards of Antaeus and the L.A. Master Chorale and a member of the boards of the Music Center and Beth Morrison Projects, a top producer of indie opera and new music. For seven years until this past February, he was a board member of the L.A. Phil.

The Gindlers recently spoke to Arroyo Monthly about where they came from, how they met and why they’re so passionate about the arts:

Before we get personal, a question about the new theater that bears your names. David, you and Kiki gave $1 million to spearhead the theater’s building fund. And you are chairman of the Antaeus board. You live in Hancock Park, nowhere near Glendale, and you had all of Los Angeles to choose from. What made you choose Glendale as the theater location?

David: Antaeus operated out of North Hollywood for a number of years, and produced [shows] on an ad hoc basis. We started our first regular season of programming in 2010, and it became apparent within the first two years that we needed a bigger space. In 2012 we began looking for a space, and the process of identifying a location was challenging. We didn’t want to actually build a building. We wanted to take an existing space and then create and model it as our own performing arts center. So that required a combination of the right building with the right ceiling heights with the right zoning, with the right parking, with the right restaurants. And then on top of that you need a landlord who’d be willing to basically make a tremendous deal so we could pay below market rent. Finding a space like that took over two years.

We have a number of company members, actors in the ensemble, who live in Glendale. We reached out to the Glendale City Council and government to see if they could help us identify a space. They were incredibly helpful. They said, ‘There’s this space that’s been empty for the longest time and you should talk to the owner.’ We did, and at first he said, ‘Thank you, but I’m not interested.’ We just sort of kept going back, and ultimately he decided to talk. As it turned out, we’d found somebody with an extraordinarily generous heart, who agreed to lease the space to us at incredibly reasonable terms. That allowed us to raise the money to build our theater. Glendale was incredibly supportive, gave us a great location in this sort of arts corridor in downtown Glendale. It’s easy to get to, it’s got great parking, great restaurants, and we built this extraordinary theater and I know the [Antaeus] company could not be happier.

David, you sound like a proud father when you talk about Antaeus.

D: Well, we have a phenomenal company of extraordinarily talented actors.

Kiki: Glendale is an example of government commitment to the arts. They’re kind of bucking the trend and leading that vision of actually understanding that the arts are integral and important to the community.

You each seem to have come from different backgrounds. Kiki, where did you grow up, and can you talk about your Latina roots?

K: My mother was Canadian, here on a green card. My father was a naturalized Mexican citizen. My parents met in L.A., so I’m first-generation American, and Angeleno. I was born at St. John’s Hospital in Santa Monica, spent my childhood on the Westside. Two of my uncles had shops on Olvera Street. My dad was a tax accountant and worked for

McDonnell Douglas in Culver City. My parents then moved to Ventura County and I went to Simi Valley High School, then to Pomona College, which is where David and I met.

David, where did you grow up?

D: Woodland Hills in the San Fernando Valley. I went to Taft High School, then to Pomona College and UCLA Law School. I met Kiki at Pomona, and we had our first date about a week after I graduated in 1981. We got married in August of 1986.

You’re both so devoted to the arts. Did that happen during your marriage or was that a shared interest from the start?

K: My father was incredibly artistic. He played piano, guitar, accordion. He knew how to paint and sculpt and he taught me all those things. My cousins with whom I grew up were always focused on the arts; we were always doing little plays, with one of my cousins directing. He’s now head of the theater department at the University of Vermont. Another cousin is now a visual artist. My connection with the arts is ingrained in my DNA.

And you, David?

D: I was lucky enough to go to public school at a time when arts education still mattered, when it was still an important part of the curriculum. For example, from junior high school through high school I played in the school orchestra, because that was an elective you could have. I learned to play the bass and developed a love of classical music. At the age of 16 I got a really cheap student subscription to the L.A. Philharmonic. I sat high in the balcony at the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion and it was fantastic.

I was also lucky enough to be part of large educational programs where students at public schools were brought downtown to see plays. I remember as a kid being taken downtown to see Oliver! at the Chandler Pavilion. And one of the most meaningful, almost life-changing experiences I had in high school was when my English class went downtown to see two plays performed at the Mark Taper Forum. One was The Importance of Being Earnest by Oscar Wilde. The other was Tom Stoppard’s Travesties. Seeing those performances was extraordinarily powerful for me, gave me a real understanding of what a force drama and storytelling could be in helping to elevate and educate. In fact, one of the most wonderful gifts I’ve ever gotten was [years later] when the folks at the Center Theatre Group found [and gave to me] what’s called the one-sheet from that performance of The Importance of Being Earnest in the 1976–77 season. A one-sheet is the [poster] that appears in the glass cases outside the theater, advertising the performance.

So the arts were important to each of you when you met. And together, you’ve built a career of giving time and money to promote the arts, both to large organizations and small, emerging ones. David, you’ve quoted Gustavo Dudamel’s reported statement that “music is a fundamental human right.” And you’ve quoted an article that said, “If as much money was spent on the arts as on the military, we wouldn’t need the military.” Kiki, you’ve said that “the arts save lives.” So I wonder what each of you think it will take to reintegrate the arts into public education? Or is it destined to all be STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) from here on out?

K: I understand that this whole emphasis on STEM started because we were falling behind in the international marketplace, and we needed to catch up to be competitive. But with the shift toward STEM, we dropped the arts education aspect, which had been so ingrained in public education for so long. One reason I just joined the Pomona College Board of Trustees is because they’re acknowledging the importance of arts education even though a good portion of their students is focused on becoming doctors, engineers or tech people. They’re understanding how important the arts is and the relationship between the parts of the brain that are used, for example, in mathematics and music. I think it’s not enough to rely on philanthropists to support the arts in children’s lives. There has to be a shift of consciousness in society and in our leaders who make decisions about curricula in schools. Brain researchers are all over this issue about how the arts are fundamental and can enhance human experience. The government is lagging behind in that realization.

D: I agree with Kiki, but I’m a bit more cynical. There was a huge retrenchment in taxation in the 1980s, when tax rates were cut dramatically at the state and federal level. The first thing that got cut was the arts. It just got decimated in California and throughout the country. It had really tragic implications for our country. We’ve basically had an entire generation who were raised without any meaningful arts education in the public schools. And now those people who never had any exposure to the arts when growing up, they are now the people who are the decision-makers. So the climb right now is a very steep one, and Kiki and I are trying our best to rail against what we think is an attitude that can really negatively impact people’s growth. The arts do matter. And I agree with Kiki that arts education saves lives. It just does.

You’ve given four gifts of $1 million and many smaller gifts. How do you choose?

D: Kiki and I think very hard about how we donate our dollars. We give to organizations that are truly committed to making an impact on Los Angeles as a community and at all levels. They’re devoted to expanding the arts and access to the arts. Some are organizations that have been impactful to Kiki and me when we grew up in Los Angeles and we want to try to help sustain that for the next generations who live here.


Antaeus Theatre Company presents Les Liaisons Dangereuses, Christopher Hampton’s award-winning adaptation of the scandalous novel by Choderlos de Laclos, at Glendale’s Kiki & David Gindler Performing Arts Center from Oct. 26 through Dec. 10. It’s a story of seduction and intrigue, complete with sex, revenge and betrayal, set in the decadence of prerevolutionary France. Performances are scheduled for 8 p.m. Thursdays and Fridays, 2 and 8 p.m. Saturdays and 2 p.m. Sundays through Dec. 10. Tickets cost $30 to $34. The Kiki & David Gindler Performing Arts Center is located at 110 E. Broadway, Glendale. Call (818) 506-1983 or visit antaeus.org.